Civil Supreme Court

Time Extension for Deposit in Specific Performance Cases: SC’s Latest Ruling Execution Court’s Powers in Specific Performance Decrees

Judicial Interpretation The key judicial interpretation, found in paragraphs 15-19, clarifies that the Execution Court, being the court of first instance, has jurisdiction to deal [more…]

Civil Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules on Stamp Duty and Penalties and Explain When Court can Impose Maximum Stamp Duty Penalties..

Judicial Interpretation The key judicial interpretation, found in paragraphs 21-21.8, outlines the steps to be followed under Sections 33, 34, 35, 37, and 39 of [more…]

Civil Supreme Court

Test Drive Gone Wrong: Who’s Responsible for the Damages? Manufacturer Can’t Shift Accident Liability to Dealer, Says Supreme Court

Judicial Interpretation The key judicial interpretation, found in paragraphs 19-20, is that the ‘owner’ of a vehicle is not limited to the categories specified in [more…]

Civil Supreme Court

Is Possession Key for Hindu Female Ownership? SC Explains!

The Court held that the lack of possession by Smt. Nandkanwarbai or her adopted son, Kailash Chand, meant they could not claim ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, rendering the Revenue suit for partition unsustainable (paras 26-27).

Civil Supreme Court

Can Rajasthan State Collect Stamp Duty on Insurance Policies? SC Explains!

The Court emphasized that while only the Parliament can prescribe the rate of stamp duty on insurance policies under Entry 91 of List I, the states have the power to impose and collect the duty as per the rate prescribed by Parliament (paras 9-19).

Civil Supreme Court

SC: All Parties Must Be Heard in ‘Minutes of Order’ Cases

The Supreme Court clarified that the practice of passing orders based on “Minutes of Order” requires careful consideration to ensure all necessary parties are impleaded and that such orders are lawful (paras 16-20).

Civil Supreme Court

Is Delay in Filing Change Reports Curable? SC Explains!

The Court held that a hypertechnical approach to delay in filing Change Reports is unwarranted, as such delays are curable and do not automatically impact the changes in the trust’s administration (paras 25-26).